Marchand Institute For Minimally Invasive Surgery

Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review

Azadi A, Marchand G, Masoud AT, Sainz K, Govindan M, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Ostergard DR

European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology · Vol 267 · pp. 90-98 · 1 Dec 2021

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020  |  PubMed 34736035  |  Full text

Cite this

Azadi A, Marchand G, Masoud AT, Sainz K, Govindan M, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Ostergard DR. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct 22;267:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34736035.

« All publications  ·  Subscribe via RSS

Azadi A, Marchand G, Masoud AT, Sainz K, Govindan M, Ware K, King A, Ruther S, Brazil G, Calteux N, Ulibarri H, Parise J, Arroyo A, Coriell C, Goetz S, Ostergard DR. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Oct 22;267:90-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.020. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 34736035.

Export citation: BibTeX  RIS / EndNote

Published on

by

Follow Our Research

New peer-reviewed papers, meta-analyses and conference presentations in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.

Browse all 138 publications Subscribe via RSS

Book Appointment